View Full Version : Your views on the members of DQ
Zackie
June 9th, 2009, 12:48 PM
In my opinoin, i find more and more members spamming and posting a lot of stupid topics. I shall not mention names. Most of the members here have a statistics of more than 10 posts day. And yes, there's a difference between posting a lot and spamming. And no, posting a lot isn't also a good thing as it's annoying to see that person's posts after every reply.
The rest of the members are awesome!
Kreekakon
June 9th, 2009, 01:13 PM
My views? Well this is what I have to say to DQ:
http://forums.deletionquality.net/showthread.php?t=5296
But I must say all of it's improved a lot.
Silitor
June 9th, 2009, 01:46 PM
I do realise that some people make posts just for the sake of getting their post count higher. No wonder some people can get their post count way high in a month or so. like to 1000. I'm thinking that the DQ site has degraded with regards to intelligence, but hasn't really been very spiteful to me... But you can't have a perfect forum.
RustyMagnum
June 9th, 2009, 03:14 PM
It a great forum in every way, now as i'm again getting on with few members.
Oh hold on, the thread was about the people? Well, pretty good guys and girls all around the place, even thought some hate me.
Flashlight
June 9th, 2009, 03:26 PM
Maybe if the Admins removed the rank system for the DQ members there probably wouldn't be some many post count wars.
Or better yet remove the post counts!
Rockonman
June 9th, 2009, 04:54 PM
It is kinda fun to see how many posts you've written and all, but when you're trying to get the most amount of posts possible, or most in this forum, or something, it's just dumb.
...I'm not telling you!
June 9th, 2009, 05:49 PM
I like you all to be honest, with the exceptions of
the newer members, because really i haven't had a chnace to get to know you
and Aval because that guys just such a cunt
Vracer
June 9th, 2009, 05:53 PM
I dislike the people who won't listen to others' opinions.
rainor
June 9th, 2009, 06:33 PM
I HATE YOU ALL <- You know it's a joke right?.And i dislike when members abuse they're post count and rank.(I hope i expresed clearly.)
Vracer
June 9th, 2009, 06:42 PM
...I forgot to mention the members who think a high post count means power on the forums. I hate people like that.
Silence
June 10th, 2009, 09:24 PM
I would kill for the golden days to be back.
Draunia05
June 10th, 2009, 10:08 PM
I second That.
Silence
June 10th, 2009, 10:27 PM
Yeah, Dale and I remember. I was almost the only n00b around.
Tac
June 10th, 2009, 11:16 PM
Yeah, Dale and I remember. I was almost the only n00b around.
Must have been a long time ago.
Zackie
June 11th, 2009, 02:53 AM
I would kill for the golden days to be back.
third that.
Polo
June 11th, 2009, 07:07 AM
I would kill for the golden days to be back.
My god you all sound like... like... like everyone else. Stop it.
Andrehydra
June 15th, 2009, 11:04 PM
I would kill for the golden days to be back.
I would kill someone from DQ for that to happen.
I agree, those days were awesome.Yeah, DQ has change dramatically, since lets say, when the hacking happened.It didn't change much but since some members gave up, month after month dozens of members join in and spam.Some members are good but they post pretty much less-cooler threads than the ones way back.
nrocha20
June 16th, 2009, 12:17 AM
I like the forum! :3 Everyone seems mighty fine to me, except a few annoying people, but thats what the ignore list is for!
demonickilla
June 16th, 2009, 12:43 AM
I Like everyone on the fourm, 'cept for that demonickilla fellow, HE'S A CUNTY ASS HOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just kidding, I LOVE HIM!
No but seriously, I like few people on this fourm, mostly because few people ar'nt spam bots/ 2 minuite joiners/ Ass holes. That is all.
EDIT: Btw 1 and 2 usally lead into 3.
Victory
June 16th, 2009, 01:29 AM
I would kill someone from DQ for that to happen.
I agree, those days were awesome.Yeah, DQ has change dramatically, since lets say, when the hacking happened.It didn't change much but since some members gave up, month after month dozens of members join in and spam.Some members are good but they post pretty much less-cooler threads than the ones way back.
Nostalgia is just chronic denial. Things were not better back in the days. In fact, in some ways things were a lot worse back in the day. My temper was significantly worse, a lot of the now decent members were immature twats and the list goes on. The old days are exactly that.... Old! It's a pathetic excuse to pardon your current reality; a way for weak minded people to cope with the fact that life isn't happy - but here's the kicker.... IT NEVER WAS! It was better in the old days - what a bunch of garbage.
You people need to grow up.
Silence
June 16th, 2009, 02:33 AM
You know vic... You're exactly right.
People constantly talk about the golden days. The golden days of life, the golden days of religion, the golden days of freaking rocket science. And you know what? For the most part, they never existed.
Razgriz
June 16th, 2009, 06:12 AM
I didn't like my old days...
Now for the members and the authorities - We got a nice and interesting lot here. Thus gives this forum an interesting atmosphere - With an exception of the discussions in the general lounge where everyone pounces on everyone. Though if there is any member that shows stupidity, power through posts, uncontrollable randomness, etc - I just avoid them and do what I usually do... Sit in one corner and watch...
Silence
June 16th, 2009, 09:53 PM
Well, I think it's died down a little bit at least.
Killervirus
June 18th, 2009, 10:21 AM
I never were old :)
AND WHY THE HELL NOONE MENTION ME :'O IM ATTENTION WHORE REMEMBER >:'|
Rabbi106
June 20th, 2009, 03:43 AM
Well. I've said this before, but...I've been here for nigh on TWO YEARS. I was here through the Hack. I was here before Repercussions was announced. I think I was here before Polo even became a Mod. Before Varthonai and Wadling and Killervirus and so many other people even JOINED! They're good people, but....Do you see where I'm going with this?
Well, other than that...minor...problem, I do hate the ranking system. A man should not be judged by the color of his skin, or how many posts he has, but by the content of his character. I see little black children, and white children, and Moderator children, and Noob children playing together in the park. I have a dream.
xXBrokenBladeXx
June 20th, 2009, 05:56 AM
I always feel bad when I see it say new member even though I've been here longer then some new people. Anyways, I find this forum a great relieve. Some many places I've been with tons of whiny people. It was nice to finally find a site based around art, animation, and writing. Plus its nice to actually have logical debates, (which i have seen several of). Basically DQ is a vastly superior site compared to many, many, many others.
Xiox
June 20th, 2009, 06:40 AM
I kind of wish people would not just join and then leave there profile to be forgotten of.. I don't know why, but I think it would be better if we actually knew who each other were. With more and more advertising of Castle, more and more people are coming here (not that it's a bad thing).. anyway, I don't even really know what I am talking about anymore :P I've only been here for about a year (not including non- membership)
Bloodshot
June 20th, 2009, 04:40 PM
Here are my views on some members of DQ:
Rabbi106: My favorite brother...well...my only brother
Killervirus: Non-Attention whoring attention whore
Silence: used to be a total asshole, but now is a bit nicer
Mastersarge300: Cool person, mean at some points
Andrehydra: not truly the little brother, but still a buddy of the true little brother...i think
...im not telling you!: the new member who has posted more in a month then i could in a year
there are my views on some of the DQ members
Xiox
June 20th, 2009, 10:19 PM
Ya, INTY must have a lot of free time, because like you said, he has posted way more than I have as well.. and I have been here way longer than he has
SooperNoobie
June 21st, 2009, 11:52 PM
I hate that SooperNoobie fag.
Anyway, I like the members here. Except Vic. He scares me. [/subtleotherthreadreference]
I just kind of wish I would post here more. Eh, I'm used to being the lurker though.
Maddermadcat
June 22nd, 2009, 01:56 AM
Things were not better back in the days. In fact, in some ways things were a lot worse back in the day. My temper was significantly worse, a lot of the now decent members were immature twats and the list goes on.
In being worse, your temper made things better. Also, those immature twats are now regulars and make up a larger fraction of the forums.
Victory
June 22nd, 2009, 02:13 AM
In conclusion, there are no good old times - just times. The only time you're allowed to say "good times" is while joking or else you're officially a retard. There are good and better moments, though, if you really have to pick favourites, but life wasn't better a few years ago; just different.
Marrden
June 22nd, 2009, 03:20 AM
In conclusion, there are no good old times - just times. The only time you're allowed to say "good times" is while joking or else you're officially a retard. There are good and better moments, though, if you really have to pick favorites, but life wasn't better a few years ago; just different.
Amen.
Killing_Time
June 22nd, 2009, 03:10 PM
I don't get why DQ time after time comes up with these threads. You guys ought to think "Hmm, will this be a thread that may contain judgement and bashing of named members?"
If the question is yes then don't post it!
Rabbi106
June 22nd, 2009, 05:11 PM
In conclusion, there are no good old times - just times. The only time you're allowed to say "good times" is while joking or else you're officially a retard.
There were good old times for the Jews during the Holocaust. The good old times were when they weren't getting killed. Nowadays, those times are the bad old times. Don't you think that should be allowed, or should they say "Oh, yeah, that was crappy, but it's not very different from how it is now." ?
SooperNoobie
June 22nd, 2009, 06:24 PM
In conclusion, there are no good old times - just times. The only time you're allowed to say "good times" is while joking or else you're officially a retard. There are good and better moments, though, if you really have to pick favourites, but life wasn't better a few years ago; just different.
You argue that you can't say there were no good ol' times before.
But you can pick your favorites of those times, which were, what you would consider, good.
But you can't say they're good, they were just different.
They were different, yes, but some of those times were obviously better than the others. (Assuming your life didn't suck 100% of the time.) From what I'm seeing you just don't see the 'golden days' of DQ as being any better than they are now. That's a matter of comparing now to then, saying that some things were better but others were worse.
Where does the argument that you can't say that there were good times come in?
pvt tony
June 22nd, 2009, 06:39 PM
I hate that SooperNoobie fag.
SYNTAX is a fag.
Polo
June 22nd, 2009, 06:46 PM
In conclusion, there are no good old times - just times.
Sure there are just times, but whether or not that time was good or not depends on what happened specifically to certain individuals.
For example, to me the 90's were good times, I was young and care free and didn't care much of the outside world because I was me and as far as I can remember back then, everything was good for me. I wasn't stuck into pits of depression thanks to my teenage anxiety.
And they were also good because of Dexters Lab and stuff ):
Maddermadcat
June 22nd, 2009, 06:56 PM
If the question is yes then don't post it!
I don't think "yes" is ever really a question.
So, you heard the woman, make some more of these.
Victory
June 22nd, 2009, 10:19 PM
You people are endlessly arrogant.
Polo, some pretty nasty shit took place in the 90's which alienates that part of history from the "good times" category. To say that it was better in the day is to focus the assortment of positive events around your life, which is a fallacy if nothing short of insulting.
I may come off as extreme which is because I aim to be extreme to explain my point. Times were never good. Life wasn't better when you were child, you were just blissfully ignorant but you had your fair share of problems back then too and don't bullshit me by saying you didn't. It wasn't better, it was just completely different.
Happy memories are happy memories, but life wasn't better back in the day and times weren't good. That's a daily doze of cycnicism and negativity to bring you back down to Earth, you hippies.
SooperNoobie
June 22nd, 2009, 10:44 PM
You people are endlessly arrogant.
Polo, some pretty nasty shit took place in the 90's which alienates that part of history from the "good times" category. To say that it was better in the day is to focus the assortment of positive events around your life, which is a fallacy if nothing short of insulting.
I may come off as extreme which is because I aim to be extreme to explain my point. Times were never good. Life wasn't better when you were child, you were just blissfully ignorant but you had your fair share of problems back then too and don't bullshit me by saying you didn't. It wasn't better, it was just completely different.
Happy memories are happy memories, but life wasn't better back in the day and times weren't good. That's a daily doze of cycnicism and negativity to bring you back down to Earth, you hippies.
Not disregarding what you're saying. I agree with you.
Hooowever, if you just say "Things weren't 100% good back then, and they aren't now. Ergo, things were just different back then than they were right now; nothing more, nothing less." is just kind of... Idk. You make sense though, because times weren't any better than they are now back then. However, that doesn't mean that the amount of shittiness back then was equal the amount of shittiness it is now. I could argue that I liked the way things were my 10th grade year compared to my 11th grade year because in 10th grade I didn't go through all the crap I had to go through this past school year. Not saying my life was devoid of any bad memories 10th grade year, but I did put up with a lot less than I had to now. I was happier then. (You could argue that life changes, you grow up, life isn't all lalala, whatever - It's not pertinent to my argument that some times in the past were better than others.)
You COULD argue that, yes, experiences in a certain time period can be both good and bad, but that doesn't make that time any better than it is compared to another time. I'd just say that's just you trying to discredit good experiences for being good experiences, though. I don't know, (Not attacking you, I'd just like a clarification.) it just looks like you're saying that, experiences aside, the times were just different in comparison to each other. Which is true. However, if you add the experiences TO the equation, comparing the two time periods, if one of them has more good than bad, and you don't live a monotonous, stagnant life, then those times become different not only just in the fact that they're two separate times, but also in the fact that in one, you WERE better off than in the other.
However now that I look at my argument, it's kind of like we're arguing two different things. You're arguing about two time periods, and I'm arguing about two time periods in relation to myself/yourself/anyone else's self.
Polo
June 22nd, 2009, 11:20 PM
Polo, some pretty nasty shit took place in the 90's which alienates that part of history from the "good times" category. To say that it was better in the day is to focus the assortment of positive events around your life, which is a fallacy if nothing short of insulting.
But that's what I meant. People tend to believe things were better in the day because that's what they do. They focus around the positive things and seemingly only the positive things, and it only tends to be what happened to them as an individual. I played my point out on purpose that way.
This video is some sort of on-topic value to it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ3DE4dXsOE
Some times Nostalgia and common fallacies surrounded by memories of the past is all we humans may ever have.
I'm extremely cynical, nostalgia makes me happy, and I like it.
INSULT, INSULT, INSULT.
Victory
June 23rd, 2009, 04:10 PM
Not disregarding what you're saying. I agree with you.
Obviously not, since you're still arguing which leads me to believe that you're missing the point, or that you lack the sufficient insight to even understand the point.
Hooowever, if you just say "Things weren't 100% good back then, and they aren't now. Ergo, things were just different back then than they were right now; nothing more, nothing less." is just kind of... Idk. You make sense though, because times weren't any better than they are now back then. However, that doesn't mean that the amount of shittiness back then was equal the amount of shittiness it is now.
An expected retort, due to its simple, common stupdity. Here's the bottom line... IT'S INCOMPARABLE! You can't treat experiences and feelings like variables of an equation, it doesn't work that way. Feelings are like fingerprints - they're all different.
I could argue that I liked the way things were my 10th grade year compared to my 11th grade year because in 10th grade I didn't go through all the crap I had to go through this past school year. Not saying my life was devoid of any bad memories 10th grade year, but I did put up with a lot less than I had to now. I was happier then. (You could argue that life changes, you grow up, life isn't all lalala, whatever - It's not pertinent to my argument that some times in the past were better than others.)
Again, you're focusing the defintion of good times around your life, a sling of psychological egoism, and we're not discussing that. We're discussing the general, all-around use the term, defining "good times" when life was generally better for everyone. A psychological scapegoat which convinces people that there's a reason life is bad that can be fixed; egro, people running away from reality.
Here's the thing; life is constantly shifting. It's a continuous wave length of highs and lows that grows larger and larger over time. Since the wave itself is constantly changing it's impossible to compare the present with the past. It's all different and it's all for naught. Comparisons are just another way of running away and coping with reality by shielding yourself with "better examples".
You COULD argue that, yes, experiences in a certain time period can be both good and bad, but that doesn't make that time any better than it is compared to another time. I'd just say that's just you trying to discredit good experiences for being good experiences, though. I don't know, (Not attacking you, I'd just like a clarification.) it just looks like you're saying that, experiences aside, the times were just different in comparison to each other. Which is true. However, if you add the experiences TO the equation, comparing the two time periods, if one of them has more good than bad, and you don't live a monotonous, stagnant life, then those times become different not only just in the fact that they're two separate times, but also in the fact that in one, you WERE better off than in the other.
Sigh... At this point, do I even have to lecture about comparisons? I mean, I'm fairly sure you get it by now. By the bye, though, you really have to stop thinking mathematically about stuff like this... it's creepy.
However now that I look at my argument, it's kind of like we're arguing two different things. You're arguing about two time periods, and I'm arguing about two time periods in relation to myself/yourself/anyone else's self.
Hey, the first smart thing you said all day.
SooperNoobie
June 23rd, 2009, 04:43 PM
Obviously not, since you're still arguing which leads me to believe that you're missing the point, or that you lack the sufficient insight to even understand the point.
An expected retort, due to its simple, common stupdity. Here's the bottom line... IT'S INCOMPARABLE! You can't treat experiences and feelings like variables of an equation, it doesn't work that way. Feelings are like fingerprints - they're all different.
Again, you're focusing the defintion of good times around your life, a sling of psychological egoism, and we're not discussing that. We're discussing the general, all-around use the term, defining "good times" when life was generally better for everyone. A psychological scapegoat which convinces people that there's a reason life is bad that can be fixed; egro, people running away from reality.
Here's the thing; life is constantly shifting. It's a continuous wave length of highs and lows that grows larger and larger over time. Since the wave itself is constantly changing it's impossible to compare the present with the past. It's all different and it's all for naught. Comparisons are just another way of running away and coping with reality by shielding yourself with "better examples".
Sigh... At this point, do I even have to lecture about comparisons? I mean, I'm fairly sure you get it by now. By the bye, though, you really have to stop thinking mathematically about stuff like this... it's creepy.
Hey, the first smart thing you said all day.
Huh. Smarter than I thought you were. Alright, thanks for clearing it up. Haha.
Oh, and the comparing things to math - Sorry. I do that a lot. xD I'll end up comparing things to other things when I'm trying to explain myself. For some reason I always try to find ways of comparing one thing to another.
Silitor
June 24th, 2009, 12:29 AM
Comparison is just another human thing. Everyone does it unconsciously, really.
Victory
June 24th, 2009, 02:52 AM
Unfortunately. I try to stay as far away from them as possible.
Thunder
June 24th, 2009, 03:07 AM
I hate you all, you incessant fucktards.
Have a nice day!
Marrden
June 24th, 2009, 04:06 AM
Skipping over what TR said, Vic needs to stop starting logic debates everywhere he goes. Though technically it isn't a logic debate since it's not logical at all. You can't say an opinion is wrong, because it's just that, an opinion. And whether or not I think that there are good ol' times or not is entirely my opinion. If I think that life was better for me 10 or 20 years ago then that's my opinion and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
Flashlight
June 24th, 2009, 11:55 AM
Have a nice day!
Thanks you to!
Victory
June 24th, 2009, 02:31 PM
Skipping over what TR said, Vic needs to stop starting logic debates everywhere he goes. Though technically it isn't a logic debate since it's not logical at all. You can't say an opinion is wrong, because it's just that, an opinion. And whether or not I think that there are good ol' times or not is entirely my opinion. If I think that life was better for me 10 or 20 years ago then that's my opinion and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
It's not an opinion to say that life was better for everyone, or that life was ever good. It's denial. If you want to be trapped inside of denial, be my guest.
Marrden
June 26th, 2009, 07:23 AM
Except that that is not what I'm saying at all. You're just trying to twist my words to win some pointless, petty argument and for that I pity you. I did not say it was better for anyone and if you were paying attention then it's pretty easy to understand what I was saying. All I said was that if I thought that life was better for ME some other time, then that is my opinion and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
Victory
June 26th, 2009, 08:38 AM
Except that's not what I was saying and NOT WHAT MY ARGUEMENT WAS FOR! God, you're such a fucking retard that you argue against yourself.
Wadling
June 26th, 2009, 10:39 AM
Here's a breakdown for y'all.
Victory is arguing about how 'good times' is a bad phrase in relation to EVERYONE.
The rest of you are arguing that 'good times' is a good phrase in relation to INDIVIDUALS.
It's like hearing this argument.
Guy 1: Hey, a cow says moo!
Guy 2: No, a sheep says baa!
Guy 1: Ummm, what does that have to do with my argument?
Guy 2: It has to do with MY ARGUMENT! RAWR! A SHEEP SAYS BAA!
Guy 1: But I was saying that a cow says moo, what does a sheep have to do with anything?
Guy 2: You're stupid.
Guy 1: wtf is going on?
(Guess who's who)
Polo
June 26th, 2009, 10:40 AM
lmao, Marrden, read that back and don't tell me that's not hypocritical. : P
Marrden
June 26th, 2009, 06:41 PM
Here's a breakdown for y'all.
Victory is arguing about how 'good times' is a bad phrase in relation to EVERYONE (and individuals).
The rest of you are arguing that 'good times' is a good phrase in relation to INDIVIDUALS/ourselves because it is impossible for one individual to speak for everyone else.
Times were never good. Life wasn't better when you were a child, you were just blissfully ignorant but you had your fair share of problems back then too and don't bullshit me by saying you didn't. It wasn't better, it was just completely different.
Depends on the situation.
Happy memories are happy memories but life wasn't better back in the day and times weren't good.
True if you are speaking overall.
I'm not trying to argue, just trying to explain my point like you did for Vic. That is all.
@Vic You have no reason to insult me or anything of the sort now. If it's possible for you to explain what you were saying without acting like an ass then do so.
Victory
June 26th, 2009, 06:48 PM
Apparently not, since you refuse to get it.
SooperNoobie
June 26th, 2009, 10:05 PM
For the record, I noticed it, Wadling. That's kind of one of the reasons I stopped arguing.
XdbX
June 26th, 2009, 10:15 PM
I stopped arguing.
Doesnt seem to be working.
-2 point for SN
Wadling
June 26th, 2009, 10:44 PM
*Stuff*
I'd just like to say, that what you did there was totally weird. I shall once again go script style to help my argument along, as it stops this being boring for me. It's like doing this.
Guy 1: The sky is blue
Guy 2: I disagree.
Guy 1: Look up, the sky is clearly blue.
Guy 2: You said the sky was orange therefor I'm right.
Guy 1: O_o
XdbX
June 26th, 2009, 10:57 PM
I'd just like to say, that what you did there was totally weird. I shall once again go script style to help my argument along, as it stops this being boring for me. It's like doing this.
Guy 1: The sky is blue
Guy 2: I disagree.
Guy 1: Look up, the sky is clearly blue.
Guy 2: You said the sky was orange therefor I'm right.
Guy 1: O_o
And for not doing a script style wadling has just gone up 10 points.
Polo
June 26th, 2009, 11:29 PM
how about we play this out:
Polo: Hey, <insert some sort of argumentative point>.
Someotherguy: Did you just hear the wind?
anotherguy: Yeh.
someotherguy: So lets just... ignore it at uh, go back to uhm, bickering.
anotherguy: Sure!
XdbX
June 26th, 2009, 11:33 PM
Point less. polo down by one 1point
kingmiami
June 27th, 2009, 12:16 AM
Well I think the best member has to be KingMiami I mean the guys just pure awsome and everybody just wants to be him.:biggrin5:
No but seriously I think that there are just spammers, commited members, smart members, and people who are nice and will give advice now and then like Oscar or Net.
Flashlight
June 27th, 2009, 03:40 AM
All of you can go to bed!!!!
And get raped!
XdbX
June 27th, 2009, 03:41 AM
Glad to do it. Becuase i know that i can rape you on any valve game or mods made for them ;)
Zackie
June 27th, 2009, 07:40 AM
All of you can go to bed!!!!
And get raped!
Even you?
Polo
June 27th, 2009, 10:09 AM
Glad to do it. Becuase i know that i can rape you on any valve game or mods made for them ;)
LOL
Go play some contra.
XdbX
June 27th, 2009, 11:19 AM
Na im half wake from staying up 2 days in a row.
Im going to go to bed get raped and then rape flash in counter strike or maybe in NS.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.