View Full Version : ZOMG 9/11
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 02:47 PM
[Taken from another
forum]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-20233208902249911
94&q=9%2F11+conspiracy
Was it real or was it al fake?
Be
ready to watch, it's an hour long.
Here's my view;
I highly
believe this documentary and going to explain why. Long post :D
Well first off. One of the planes (or was it both? Meh whatever),
it clearly was'nt a boeing, or any other passenger plane for that matter.
The airliner(s) that was hijacked could have easily been flown into the
middle of the ocean somewhere while every single camera and satellite was
situated on the wtc's, without anyone having a clue. And the explosions in
the tower after the plane hit, A huge explosion 50 feet from where the plane
actually hit? Multiple explosions in the floors below? This could not have
been the result of a plane hitting. Unless some people with bombs strapped to
them jumped out the plane before it hit and blew up when they hit the floors
below (Which is just silly). And the mysterious explosion in the lobby. No
smoke, no rubble. Just a marble wall blown from the foundations. Maybe an
early 'pre-planted bomb' going off? These explosions can obviously never be
explained and no one will ever know the real truth (Apart from the FBI of
course).
Now onto the pentagon. The mysterious line along the ground
where the so called 'plane' travelled, the missile like sound that people
supposedly heard, the clearing of cars from a few feet. These can't really
be explained, but from the evidence we were given, it's pretty obvious no
'plane' hit the pentagon. As you saw, a car travelling arond 100 feet
behind a boeing engine get's blown away like a small child in a hurricane.
If the so called 'plane' did travel 50 feet above the road. Howcome the
cars did'nt get blown away? The shear force of a boeing travelling at insane
speeds could probably blow over a fuel tanker. But a cruise missile? Might
just blow over a small child on a push bike. If it were 50 feet away anyway.
And the hole. How could a 120 foot wide jet make a hole less than a tenth
it's size, with no debris outside the pentagon? Did it somehow fold up into
the size of a small truck before it hit? I highly doubt it. There was no
plane involved here. There were no terrorists involved here. This was
strictly planned by the US itself. A cruise missile at the nerve centre of
american defence? The perfect way for the US to get anything they want from
anyone they want. And the debris that the FBI took away in a large covered
box? That was no destroyed plane, nor part of the pentagon that needed to be
kept secret. This was the remains of the missile that had struck the
building. Clearly they had done a shoddy job, leaving the engine rotor lying
around. Tut tut.
Well anyway. Now for my view on the reason for this
attack. The FBI, for some unkown reason wanted to get rid of the twin towers.
So they made a deal with Usama Bin Laden, he gets people to hijack some
airliners and get rid of them, and the FBI give him anything he wants. But
being the US, they were'nt telling the complete truth. As soon as they heard
that 2 planes had been hijacked, they set off their 2 'cargo planes'. This
would of course, be a perfect coverup. But because they did not want to give
Usama what he wanted, they got everyone important in the pentagon to move
over to the safe side. Then launched a cruise missile into the 'useless'
side. Of course, Usama being the one that set up the hijacks, must have also
destroyed the pentagon. Now having an unexplained explosion on his hands,
Usama could not get anything from the FBI. He had no evidence that the
Pentagon attack was not his. Now for the US to take whatever they want from
Iraq. Which they did.
Well, I have'nt read this through, and it's
5:38am here, so there's probably some grammatical and spelling errors in
there somewhere. Oh well, I might have also contradicted myself a few times
and said stupid things. But I dont care :0
ThePieLord
January 7th, 2006, 03:21 PM
This was a giant coverup, i knew about it earlier.
Its hosted somewhere else, i think aswell |]
I saw it before
somewhere.
But yeah, ill bet they did it to themselves, just to gain media
coverage, to take the mind off the other coverups theyre currently running
:S
Because
January 7th, 2006, 04:47 PM
Amazing what computers
can do these days, but still very convincing.
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 04:50 PM
You're an idiot
¬.¬
None of that is computer generated.
Because
January 7th, 2006, 04:52 PM
Well were watching it on a computer arent we?
paolo_viper
January 7th, 2006, 04:53 PM
[Taken from another
forum]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-20233208902249911
94&q=9%2F11+conspiracy
Was it real or was it al fake?
Be
ready to watch, it's an hour long.
Here's my view;
I highly
believe this documentary and going to explain why. Long post :D
Well first off. One of the planes (or was it both? Meh whatever),
it clearly was'nt a boeing, or any other passenger plane for that matter.
The airliner(s) that was hijacked could have easily been flown into the
middle of the ocean somewhere while every single camera and satellite was
situated on the wtc's, without anyone having a clue. And the explosions in
the tower after the plane hit, A huge explosion 50 feet from where the plane
actually hit? Multiple explosions in the floors below? This could not have
been the result of a plane hitting. Unless some people with bombs strapped to
them jumped out the plane before it hit and blew up when they hit the floors
below (Which is just silly). And the mysterious explosion in the lobby. No
smoke, no rubble. Just a marble wall blown from the foundations. Maybe an
early 'pre-planted bomb' going off? These explosions can obviously never be
explained and no one will ever know the real truth (Apart from the FBI of
course).
Now onto the pentagon. The mysterious line along the ground
where the so called 'plane' travelled, the missile like sound that people
supposedly heard, the clearing of cars from a few feet. These can't really
be explained, but from the evidence we were given, it's pretty obvious no
'plane' hit the pentagon. As you saw, a car travelling arond 100 feet
behind a boeing engine get's blown away like a small child in a hurricane.
If the so called 'plane' did travel 50 feet above the road. Howcome the
cars did'nt get blown away? The shear force of a boeing travelling at insane
speeds could probably blow over a fuel tanker. But a cruise missile? Might
just blow over a small child on a push bike. If it were 50 feet away anyway.
And the hole. How could a 120 foot wide jet make a hole less than a tenth
it's size, with no debris outside the pentagon? Did it somehow fold up into
the size of a small truck before it hit? I highly doubt it. There was no
plane involved here. There were no terrorists involved here. This was
strictly planned by the US itself. A cruise missile at the nerve centre of
american defence? The perfect way for the US to get anything they want from
anyone they want. And the debris that the FBI took away in a large covered
box? That was no destroyed plane, nor part of the pentagon that needed to be
kept secret. This was the remains of the missile that had struck the
building. Clearly they had done a shoddy job, leaving the engine rotor lying
around. Tut tut.
Well anyway. Now for my view on the reason for this
attack. The FBI, for some unkown reason wanted to get rid of the twin towers.
So they made a deal with Usama Bin Laden, he gets people to hijack some
airliners and get rid of them, and the FBI give him anything he wants. But
being the US, they were'nt telling the complete truth. As soon as they heard
that 2 planes had been hijacked, they set off their 2 'cargo planes'. This
would of course, be a perfect coverup. But because they did not want to give
Usama what he wanted, they got everyone important in the pentagon to move
over to the safe side. Then launched a cruise missile into the 'useless'
side. Of course, Usama being the one that set up the hijacks, must have also
destroyed the pentagon. Now having an unexplained explosion on his hands,
Usama could not get anything from the FBI. He had no evidence that the
Pentagon attack was not his. Now for the US to take whatever they want from
Iraq. Which they did.
Well, I have'nt read this through, and it's
5:38am here, so there's probably some grammatical and spelling errors in
there somewhere. Oh well, I might have also contradicted myself a few times
and said stupid things. But I dont care :0
It was all a cover up
for cash.Like almost every thing
ThePieLord
January 7th, 2006, 05:23 PM
Amazing what computers can do these days, but still very
convincing.
Say WHAT?
None of that is made by computers.
That is the actual picture or the building, the actual picture of the holes,
etc, etc, captured by security cameras, news reporters, and government
operatives. the only was a computer was used was putting the video up on the
internet.
Jeez.
paolo_viper
January 7th, 2006, 05:31 PM
Becaus, your a noob
Because
January 7th, 2006, 05:51 PM
Actually if you read my post after that I didnt even mean it was
edited you idiot. Your the fucking n00b, and thats why people hate you for
un-neccasary flaming and your terrible spelling. And dont tell me your
"learning english" you can atleast spell my name right.
paolo_viper
January 7th, 2006, 06:10 PM
Actually if you read my post after that I didnt even mean it
was edited you idiot. Your the fucking n00b, and thats why people hate you
for un-neccasary flaming and your terrible spelling. And dont tell me your
"learning english" you can atleast spell my name right.
I cant
write proper english and you dont know any bulgarian.ha ha your stupid
шибаняк.
Because
January 7th, 2006, 06:25 PM
Well if Bulgarian is anything like Russian, then I could. Which the letters
are.
paolo_viper
January 7th, 2006, 06:37 PM
Well if Bulgarian is anything like
Russian
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha, bullshit bulgarian and russian
are verry much alike.but you cant talk bulgarin.if you can what is this in
english Мразя те huh?
you dont
know do ya hahahahahahahahaha
Spike
January 7th, 2006, 06:53 PM
Oookay, you guys get out of the thread and play outside, this is a serious
thread, its not in the spam forums, and its not named 'Come here for flame
war' or something.
On topic
I saw a link to this on a gaming forum
i frequent, but i didnt feel like wathcing it, ill watch it now and see what
i think.
AlbinoZombie
January 7th, 2006, 07:03 PM
I only watch movies on the internet one hour and under...that is waaay over
my limit.
Blackwater
January 7th, 2006, 08:22 PM
Ok guys, quit flaming eachother- Besides that
Bulgarian is a random language and Because's opinion is that it could have
been editted, theres no reason to argue. Plus the video is way to blurry for
them to prove anything- that and just because the bottom of the plane is
painted a different color doesn't mean its extra equipment. Different
airlines paint planes different colors ALL the time. But it is possible that
it was a coverup: I just think the plane analysis was stupid and compensation
for lack of real evidence.
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 08:53 PM
Dont you think
that they had enough 'real' evidence? The plane not just being a different
colour, but being a completely different plane. I think that might be enough
'real' evidence :wink:
I only watch movies on
the internet one hour and under...that is waaay over my limit.
That is one hour :P
Devastation
January 7th, 2006, 09:06 PM
This is very true i believe (no offence now) but
the jewish people, make alot of money (fact) and NO jewish people were killed
that day, also Osama's dad worked in politics very closly with Bush, and
apparently the CIA was in on it to, and why the hell cant they find Osama...
could he have had extreme plastic surgery, and be livving free in the US
somewhere.Another idea is that Bush wanted this to happen because then he
could make a war with Iraq,and guess who gains from this, HE does, americas
indusrty is doing great, with all the metal,and arms factories burning the
preverbial fire of industy.Discussion...
Anyway,lets all take one
moment to bless Oscar and his F@#KING SUPA animations.Good night
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 09:09 PM
When the hell did jews come into this conversation?
Devastation
January 7th, 2006, 09:11 PM
Just another fact to
add to it...
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 09:13 PM
But jews had nothing to do with 9/11...
It's just like me saying that London's waste has gone up by 70% in the last
decade while talking about the holocaust lets say.
Devastation
January 7th, 2006, 09:15 PM
ALRIGHT ALRIGHT,
ignore what i said every one(only the jewish people part though)but dont you
think my other parts were quite relevent...
Div658
January 7th, 2006, 09:16 PM
Yes. Good lass. Now stop taking up space in this
thread :0
Blackwater
January 8th, 2006, 08:10 AM
Except that you linked Osama to Iraq.. o.O
Devastation
January 8th, 2006, 09:06 AM
im sorry im generalizing,
Iraq (no offence) is a muslim country, and Yankee land (AMERICA) went to war
or had a conflict with iraq and all those places,they called it a holy
war...
Div658
January 8th, 2006, 03:21 PM
Except that you linked Osama to Iraq..
o.O
Just... Shush.
ThePieLord
January 9th, 2006, 10:14 PM
Actually if you read my post
after that I didnt even mean it was edited you idiot. Your the fucking n00b,
and thats why people hate you for un-neccasary flaming and your terrible
spelling. And dont tell me your "learning english" you can atleast spell my
name right.
Actually, if you knew anything about grammar, youd
know that unnecessary is a compund word, and consists of only one "a"
You
cant verbally abuse people who have terrible spelling.
Also, at least has
a space inbetween it, meaning at and least are two different goddamn
words.
Jesus.
Blackwater
January 9th, 2006, 10:17 PM
Well he never said they meant the same thing. :wink:
NooDLeS
January 10th, 2006, 12:15 AM
I believe it was all
fake. I think that there are people out there just THAT crazy enough to do
that. Fucking bastards. Computer generated my ass. Theres no way the could
computer generate the pentagon. If that one "crash" didnt prove it i dont
know what does.
nugget
January 10th, 2006, 01:09 AM
anti-semetism taking
place on forums, how sad.
Oh ya, and the videos weren't edited, not
sying that bush killed all those innocent people and lied to everyone and
invaded Iraq becuase of weapons of mass destruction which they never found
but are still in Iraq for no apperant reason -cough- oil -cough-...but it
could be true :)
t231
January 10th, 2006, 02:12 AM
Now that i look at
it, it makes sense. :)
Long_Haired_Buddy
January 10th, 2006, 02:12 PM
Well, his parents has told him
that jews are very bad people. So if something goes wrong he blaims them.
Anyhow....
Because
January 10th, 2006, 11:56 PM
Im a Jew >=( Besides, even if some Jews were related to it,
which theyre not, it would be impossible to know which people were Jews. My
mom got sci a day or 2 before 9/11 she worked like a block away from the
place.
ThePieLord
January 11th, 2006, 10:05 PM
My uncle's Jewish.
Yeah uh...jews
werent involved in 9/11
And the whole thing nugget said about Bush, its
all true. Ill bet hes friggin hiding the WMDs.
Fu
January 14th, 2006, 10:01 AM
Amazing what computers can do
these days, but still very convincing.
dude did you seriously
listen to any of the stuff they actually said in the video? How can they
"computer generate" the death of 3000 people? how do they "computer generate"
the collapse of 2 skyscrapers?
I don't know what to think anymore,
thank god there still are those people making those videos.
VipER X
January 14th, 2006, 03:32 PM
i think the government tried to cover it up, but i dont think they actually
planned it, i think that they knew about it and made all these changes like
insuring the twin towers 3x as much THREE days before it happened.
nugget
January 14th, 2006, 05:49 PM
I just think that the US
government is gay. Good thing I don't live in the US and it isn't
communist, or else this post could get me a garuanteed decapitation :D.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.